Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass

Innovation and Economic Growth

Article Snapshot

Author(s)

Mary L. Gray and Siddharth Suri

Source

Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2019 (forthcoming)

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems often rely on human workers to classify content. The workers find tasks using on-demand labor platforms like Mechanical Turk, receiving low wages and no benefits; however, on-demand work platforms enable many disadvantaged workers to earn income.

Policy Relevance

Over time, on-demand labor will displace full-time employment. Policymakers and firms should ensure that on-demand workers are treated humanely.

Main Points

  • Smartphone apps, web sites, and AI systems rely on the judgment of human laborers, “ghost workers” invisible to consumers.
     
    • Uber relies on humans to ensure that the selfies that Uber drivers use when checking in to work match their ID photos.
       
    • Facebook, Twitter, and other online services use AI to filter out some offensive content, but human workers must classify hard-to-evaluate materials.
       
  • Workers obtain tasks from on-demand labor platforms like Mechanical Turk, LeadGenius, Amara, and Clickworker.
     
  • There are between 200,000 and 500,000 registered Mechanical Turk workers; 2000 to 5000 are usually working at any given moment.
     
    • Overseas workers are concentrated in some regions, such as the southern part of India.
       
    • Amazon charges 20 percent of a worker’s paycheck as a fee for operating the platform.
       
    • 75 percent of Mechanical Turk workers have another source of income.
       
  • On-demand workers are a new type of worker, with no fixed connection to one firm; firms must constantly reinvent offerings to customers, and cannot meet this constant demand with a stable of full-time employees.
     
  • As of 2016, 8 percent of adults in the United States, about 20 million people, earn money performing on-demand tasks offline or online.
     
    • Online on-demand jobs did not exist before 2005.
       
    • By 2055, 60 percent of labor will consist of online, on-demand task work.
       
  • Typically, on-demand workers fit one of three profiles:
     
    • Most try out a few platforms, do a few tasks, and leave within a month.
       
    • Some participate for less than 10 hours per month, until they meet a financial goal.
       
    • The core workforce averages 30 hours per week, and performs the majority of the tasks.
       
  • On-demand workers receive low wages and no benefits, lack opportunities for advancement, and are isolated from other workers; also, workers face problems with wrongfully terminated accounts, and 30 percent report not being paid for work they have done.
     
  • Workers who struggle to find regular jobs due to their gender, religion, or disabilities can earn income through on-demand labor platforms; many ghost workers are stay-at-home mothers.
     
  • Policies that would improve the lives of on-demand workers include:
     
    • Support for guild-like communities, unions, and rating systems to build workers’ knowledge base and reputations, and address problems with shoddy workers.
       
    • On-demand platforms should offer access to software tools, so workers do not bear the costs of doing the work.
       
    • Public provision of improved safety nets, including health care and educational opportunities.
       
  • Legislation could help make firms be accountable to workers and consumers for conditions of on-demand work, just as the Fair Food program improved conditions of the lowest paid farm workers in the United States.
     

 

Get The Article

Find the full article online

Search for Full Article

Share