Process as Purpose: Administrative Procedure, Costly Screens, and Examination at the Patent Office

Intellectual Property and Patents

Article Snapshot

Author(s)

Jonathan S. Masur

Source

John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Papr No. 393, 2009

Summary

This paper looks at benefits from fees and bureaucratic hurdles at the patent office.

Policy Relevance

If patents were easier to get, nuisance lawsuits might multiply.

Main Points

  • Patent examiners do a remarkably poor job of screening out invalid applications, and the examination process is very expensive.

  • Many reform proposals seek to improve the quality of patent review and reduce the cost.

  • The high costs of getting a patent actually have important benefits.
    • Applicants reveal how much value they think their innovation has.
    • The process stops applicants from collecting patents for the main purpose of filing lawsuits to extract nuisance settlements from commercial firms willing to pay the filers to go away.

 

  • Expensive administrative processes also screen out similar problems in landlord-tenant and employment law, environmental permitting, and immigration law.

  • The private costs of the navigating the process may pose a more effective barrier to entry than the process itself.

Get The Article

Find the full article online

Search for Full Article

Share