Competition Policy and Antitrust

Competition policy uses economic analysis to enhance our understanding of how firm behavior affects social welfare. Scholars featured on this site consider how technology markets function, and the special issues raised by networks, platforms, interoperability, and bundling by firms like Google, Apple, and Microsoft.

Back to main Competition Policy and Antitrust page

Upcoming Events

Big Tech & Antitrust Conference

By the Information Society Project & Thurman Arnold Project

October 3, 2020, New Haven, CT

47th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy

Presented by the Fordham Competition Law Institute

October 7, 2020,  

United States v. Apple: Competition in America; Chris Sagers

Presented by the Information Society Project

November 10, 2020,  

TAP Blog

Recent Papers from TAP Scholars

A selection of articles recently written by TAP scholars explore AI and business competition, autonomous vehicles, how privacy regulation could support innovation, privacy interfaces focused on peoples’ needs, and licensing standard-essential patents for 5G telecommunications.

TAP Staff Blogger

Fact Sheets

Comparative Antitrust

In the United States, “antitrust law” refers to the body of State and Federal laws that prohibits unlawful agreements and practices by firms with market power that harm competition. Europe, Asia and Latin America call the governance of market competition “competition law”.


When Regulators Fail to Rein in Big Tech, Some Turn to Antitrust Litigation

Unlike cases brought by government agencies, which presumably seek to address consumer harm, judges sometimes view private plaintiffs as whining about their inability to compete. — Eleanor Fox, Professor of Antitrust Law, New York University
Eleanor Fox
The Washington Post
August 21, 2020

Featured Article

Privacy’s Constitutional Moment and the Limits of Data Protection

The United States Congress must decide whether to enact a national privacy law like Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But GDPR-style rules fail to protect against many harms of data overuse.

By: Neil Richards, Woodrow Hartzog