Intellectual Property

Copyright and Trademark

Copyrights and trademark are both types of intellectual property (IP). Copyright is a legal term describing rights given to creators for their literary and artistic works. A trademark provides protection to the owner of the mark by ensuring the exclusive right to use it to identify goods or services, or to authorize another to use it in return for payment.

Back to main Copyright and Trademark page

TAP Blog

We recently sat down with Stan Liebowitz to discuss his work on piracy and economics, as well as learn a little bit more about his journey from an ice cream vendor to one of the brightest scholars in the technology policy world.
In an op-ed piece for The Los Angeles Times, Professor Pamela Samuelson weighs the value of creating a digital collection of all the world’s books against the challenges of overcoming copyright law expenses and barriers.
Last month Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy hosted an event that looked at the state of online copyright enforcement. Video is now available from ‘Copyright Cat-and-Mouse: New Developments in Online Enforcement.’
Professor James Grimmelmann, New York Law School, examines a current copyright infringement case between the silent magician Teller and a Dutch magician. Professor Grimmelmann examines the complaint in the case as well as the registration of the specific magic trick in order to determine what the “work” protected by copyright is, and whether Teller’s registration can support anything beyond the four corners of the stage directions.
Professor James Grimmelmann, New York Law School, examines Aereo’s plans to capture over-the-air TV signals and stream them to customers in the New York area against the U.S. copyright laws.
TAP scholar Peter DiCola will be moderating a panel on “Copyright and the Future of Entertainment” at next week’s symposium on intellectual property and the influence of technology.
Much to my happiness, the internets are in a frenzy about the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (aka SOPA).
Piracy is a top concern for U.S. lawmakers. Two bills now pending in Congress, the PROTECT IP Act of 2011 and the Stop Online Piracy Act, are expected to generate a lot of debate as they come up for votes this legislative session. Professor Mark Lemley and co-authors David S. Levine, and David G. Post examine these proposed bills in their article, “Don’t Break the Internet.”
Professor Jonathan Zittrain of Harvard Law School debates the Stop Online Piracy Act on “The Colbert Report.”
Jason Mazzone, the Gerald Baylin Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, has just published Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011). Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales calls the book “a must read for anyone who cares about the future of creativity” and says that it will “transform debates about balancing private property with public access to information in the digital age.”
Results 41 - 50 of 68
|< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >|

Upcoming Events

There are currently no upcoming events for Copyright and Trademark. Please see our events calendar for all upcoming events.

Fact Sheets

Piracy and IP Enforcement

In the context of technology, “piracy” is a colloquial term for the illegal copying of copyrighted works. The related problem of counterfeiting is the illegal reproduction of patented or trademarked products.


Google’s Supreme Court Faceoff with Oracle Was a Disaster for Google

There's a real chance the Supreme Court could focus on this issue [the copyright status of APIs] in its decision—perhaps sending the case back down to the lower courts for even more litigation. — James Grimmelmann, Professor of Law, Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School

James Grimmelmann
Ars Technica
October 8, 2020

Featured Article

Privacy as Commons: Case Evaluation Through the Governing Knowledge Commons Framework

“Privacy” is best defined as a matter of the appropriate flow of information. A concept known as the “general knowledge commons” helps analyze privacy problems, although the concept was developed for creative content rather than privacy analysis.

By: Katherine Strandburg, Brett M. Frischmann