Explores new developments in how patent courts approach the claims construction process. This is the third report in a 7-part series of posts from the 16th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute: Silicon Valley.
Discusses recent developments in how the forum affects patent procedures. This is the second report in a 7-part series of posts from the 16th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute: Silicon Valley.
Key insights from a panel discussion on patent eligibility and patentable subject matter. This is the first report in a 7-part series of posts from the 16th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute: Silicon Valley.
This post introduces a 7-part series of reports from The 16th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute: Silicon Valley.
Northeastern University law professor Andrea Matwyshyn debates hypothetical law cases of the future that are based on the assumed evolution of current technologies.
Professors Jacques Crémer and Josh Lerner discuss Jean Tirole’s “remarkable set of contributions to economics.” Jean Tirole received the 2014 Nobel Prize in Economics.
Santa Clara University law professor Colleen Chien shares her findings from surveying hundreds of startups that have been approached with patent demands.
Professor Jay Pil Choi and Professor Carl Shapiro have recently released separate papers that examine patent litigation through non-practicing entities, patent-assertion entities, and standard-essential patents.
The 13th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference will cover topics as diverse as the economics of online privacy, competitive effects of regulation, patent troll litigation strategies, and competition in hospital premiums. TAP scholars Jay Pil Choi and James Rebitzer will be participating.
Professor Daniel Spulber, Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, examines two pieces of patent legislation, The Innovation Act (H.R.9) and the STRONG Patents Act (S.632). Professor Spulber shows that one threatens to weaken the patent system while the other one could strengthen it.