ACADEMIC ARTICLE SUMMARY
Algorithms at Work: Productivity Monitoring Applications and Wearable Technology as the New Data-Centric Research Agenda for Employment and Labor Law
Article Source: St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 21-54, 2018
Publication Date:
Time to Read: 2 minute readSearch for the full article on Bing
ARTICLE SUMMARY
Summary:
Increasingly, employers use applications and wearable technologies to monitor employees at work. Monitoring systems raise new legal issues related to privacy rights, discrimination, and worker safety.
POLICY RELEVANCE
Policy Relevance:
Workers’ reasonable expectations of privacy have no settled, clear definition.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Takeaways:
- Productivity monitoring apps and wearable technologies have altered organizations' management of employees and raise new legal questions concerning employee privacy rights.
- Productivity monitoring applications call for rebalancing of employer's pecuniary interests and workers' privacy rights.
- Employees often object to the use of smartphone apps and GPS to monitor their conduct outside of work, when they are on call.
- Courts have ruled that tracking company vehicles does not violate privacy rights, but tracking workers’ own vehicles outside of work hours may violate reasonable expectations of privacy.
- Employees often object to the use of smartphone apps and GPS to monitor their conduct outside of work, when they are on call.
- Monitoring applications might help or worsen the situation of employees struggling with hostile work environments.
- Wearable technologies in the workplace such as helmets, bracelets, and vests raise new legal issues related to privacy concerns, discrimination, worker safety, and workers' compensation.
- The devices strain privacy constraints, such as the requirement that notice and consent be given for data collection.
- Wearable devices often collect health-related data and may support discrimination against those with disabilities.
- Data collected by these devices can be used to improve safety, or serve as evidence in injury-related lawsuits.
- The devices strain privacy constraints, such as the requirement that notice and consent be given for data collection.
- Privacy law researchers should better define a "reasonable expectation of privacy" for employees, and resolve legal questions over employers' use of data about employees.