ACADEMIC ARTICLE SUMMARY
Cooperative Marketing Agreements Between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools
Article Source: Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 03-25, April 2003
Publication Date:
Time to Read: 1 minute readSearch for the full article on Bing
ARTICLE SUMMARY
Summary:
This paper looks at organizations known as “patent pools,” or groups of firms that license patents to one another.
POLICY RELEVANCE
Policy Relevance:
Some worry that patent pools exclude competition, but evidence shows that larger pools are friendly to competition.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Takeaways:
- A “patent pool” is a group of firms that agree to license related patents to one another.
- Pools are more likely to allow firms outside the pool to license pool patents when the patents are not substitutes for one another.
- Pools with more members are:
- More likely to allow nonmember to license pool patents.
- More likely to control any litigation.
- Have more third-party licensing of pool patents.
- Since 1995, some pools were disallowed because of competition policy, so pools focused on more important patents.
- Evidence suggests that pools are mainly to solve problems with overlapping claims to technology, and not to collude.