ACADEMIC ARTICLE SUMMARY
Does Service Bundling Reduce Churn?
Article Source: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 839-875, 2014
Publication Date:
Time to Read: 2 minute readSearch for the full article on Bing
ARTICLE SUMMARY
Summary:
This study considers whether firms that sell telecommunications services as a bundle find it easier to retain customers. The data shows that bundling does reduce “churn” for pay television, broadband, and telephone service.
POLICY RELEVANCE
Policy Relevance:
Bundling help firms maintain revenues from shrinking markets. Policymakers should not intervene with the decision to bundle.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Takeaways:
- “Bundling” occurs when a firm sells two or more services in a package for a single price. From 2007 to 2009, almost all cable television operators offered a bundle of telephone, broadband, and pay television service (satellite or cable) known as “triple play.”
- “Churn” is a customer’s abandonment of a service provider; this paper asks whether consumers that purchase a bundle of services are less likely to “churn.”
- If bundling reduces churn, bundling will affect competition in video markets.
- Firms could gain market power and raise prices.
- Bundling creates barriers to entry, as new entrants find it harder to attract customers.
- Bundling could help keep certain markets from shrinking.
- Firms could gain market power and raise prices.
- The data shows that bundling does reduce churn for telephone, broadband, and television service, however, the effect was not the same every year for every type of service.
- The effect of bundling was most noticeable for markets in turmoil, for example, when customers began to drop some kinds of service; the role of bundling in keeping certain markets from shrinking is very important.
- The purchase rate of pay television in 2009 was 2.2% higher for bundled households.
- By bundling, the cable companies saved about $259 million in revenue.
- The purchase rate of pay television in 2009 was 2.2% higher for bundled households.
- Consumers consider broadband a substitute for television; in 2009, as it became possible to stream more video online, many more households bought broadband but not pay television.
- Bundlers had lower income and education levels than those that purchase services separately.
- Whether bundling leaves consumers better or worse off overall depends on benefits that consumers obtain with the bundle; generally, policymakers should not intervene in firms’ bundling decisions.