ACADEMIC ARTICLE SUMMARY
Privacy at the Margins/Refractive Surveillance: Monitoring Customers to Manage Workers
Article Source: International Journal of Communication, Vol. 12, pp. 1166-1188, 2018
Publication Date:
Time to Read: 2 minute readSearch for the full article on Bing
ARTICLE SUMMARY
Summary:
Customer information collected by retailers is often used to manage workers. Often, retailer’s use of this data harms workers.
POLICY RELEVANCE
Policy Relevance:
Policymakers should consider the effect of data collection on groups other than the target of the surveillance.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Takeaways:
- “Refractive surveillance” occurs when information is collected about one group to facilitate control over another; for example, retailers’ collection of customer data facilitates control over workers.
- Low-wage workers’ economic status may depend on information that retailers collect about more privileged groups.
- Brick and mortar stores track customers for two reasons:
- Retailers try to address the knowledge gap between workers and customers (who may know more about products and prices than workers);
- Retailers seek to approximate the amount of data collected by e-commerce retailers.
- Retailers try to address the knowledge gap between workers and customers (who may know more about products and prices than workers);
- Retailers use sensors that track customer’s activities on the retail floor, collect data about customers’ behavior on other platforms, and create customer profiles using social media posts.
- Retailers use data in ways that could harm workers:
- Retailer’s efforts to optimize scheduling leads to unfair and unpredictable schedules for workers.
- Retailers pressure workers to reveal information learned from encounters with customers, making the worker less valuable to the firm.
- Retail data collection supports automation and the replacement of workers.
- Retailer’s efforts to optimize scheduling leads to unfair and unpredictable schedules for workers.
- Some scheduling software developers had adapted their software in response to critics, giving workers more power to alter unworkable schedules; this raises the possibility that software could advance workers’ interests.