Skip to main content
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
  • Topics
    • Topics

    • Topics OverviewOverview
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning OverviewOverview
      • Artificial Intelligence Policy
      • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
      • Generative AI
    • Cybersecurity
      • Cybersecurity

      • Cybersecurity OverviewOverview
      • Cyber Peace / Cyber Warfare
      • Election Security
    • Impact of Tech on Society
      • Impact of Tech on Society

      • Impact of Tech on Society OverviewOverview
      • Future of Work
      • Tech’s Impact on Economic Equity
      • Tech’s Impact on Racial and Gender Equity
    • Innovation and Economic Impact
    • Intellectual Property and Open Source
      • Intellectual Property and Open Source

      • Intellectual Property and Open Source OverviewOverview
      • Copyright and Trademarks
      • Open Source
      • Patents
    • Networks and Infrastructure
      • Networks and Infrastructure

      • Networks and Infrastructure OverviewOverview
      • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
      • Cloud Computing
      • Internet
      • Net Neutrality
    • Platforms and Platform Regulation
      • Platforms and Platform Regulation

      • Platforms and Platform Regulation OverviewOverview
      • Antitrust / Competition
      • Content Moderation/Section 230
      • Disinformation / Misinformation
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Media and Content
    • Privacy
      • Privacy

      • Privacy OverviewOverview
      • Cross-Border Data Transfers
  • Scholars
  • Events
  • For the Media
    • For the Media

    • Media OverviewMedia Overview
    • Fact Sheets
    • Press Releases
  • About TAP
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter

Breadcrumbs

Go up a level to Home is the parent page of

  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Facebook
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Twitter
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Email
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via LinkedIn
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Pinterest
BLOG POST

Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines

Publication Date: January 21, 2022 4 minute read
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
Featuring

Carl Shapiro

Carl ShapiroTAP Scholar
  • Innovation and Economic Impact
  • Antitrust / Competition

“When the Federal Trade Commission investigates vertical mergers, will it dismiss elimination of double marginalization (EDM) in cases that do not fit the very narrow fact pattern which the majority (incorrectly) believes to be the only one in which EDM applies? That could lead to enforcement errors and the prospect of embarrassing losses in court.”
—Carl Shapiro, from “How Will the FTC Evaluate Vertical Mergers?”

In a new article, “How Will the FTC Evaluate Vertical Mergers?,” UC Berkeley economics professor Carl Shapiro argues that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent withdrawal of its 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines is incorrect as a matter of microeconomic theory and is contrary to an extensive economic literature about vertical integration.

Professor Shapiro focuses his critique on the FTC’s handling of “elimination of double marginalization” (EDM)—the theory that a vertical merger can promote competition by eliminating double markups that occur when two independent firms sell and then resell a product.

In explaining its withdrawal of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines, the FTC asserted that the guidelines’ reliance on EDM is theoretically flawed because EDM creates downward pricing pressure only under specific factual scenarios: (a) mergers that involve one single-product monopoly buying another single-product monopoly in the same supply chain; (b) both charge monopoly prices pre-merger; and (c) the product from one firm is used as input by the other in a fixed-proportion production process.

The following excerpts from “How Will the FTC Evaluate Vertical Mergers?” highlight some of Professor Shapiro’s concerns about the FTC’s statement.

EDM and Vertical Merger Inquiry

EDM applies (a) to multi-product firms, (b) regardless of whether the firms at either level have monopoly power or charge monopoly prices, and (c) regardless of whether the downstream production process involves fixed proportions. All of this has been included in economics textbooks for decades, building on a seminal 1950 paper by Joseph Spengler.
While EDM does not save every vertical merger, it should be a part of any vertical merger inquiry and is not nearly as limiting as the [FTC] majority’s statement suggests.
Our view is that Vertical Merger Guidelines should make clear that the merging parties bear the burden of establishing EDM, just as they bear the burden of establishing all efficiencies in horizontal as well as vertical mergers.

On the Competitive Harm of Mergers

The FTE’s statement is contrary to a broad consensus among economists going back at least to a seminal 1968 article by Oliver Williamson. In many cases a merger (horizontal or vertical) will do no competitive harm because its efficiencies will completely offset any threatened anticompetitive effects. But this is a factual query.
Further, the FTC’s statement is flatly inconsistent with the Horizontal Merger Guidelines issued by the Department of Justice and the FTC. Ironically, the aggressive antitrust enforcer and FTC Chair Robert Pitofsky recognized the need to include efficiencies in the merger guidelines and in fact did so in 1997.

Merger Review is Not Just About Price Effects

Merger review is not just about price effects. Often the effect of a merger on product quality and innovation is far more important.
In vertical mergers, EDM receives a lot of attention because it is well understood and amenable to quantification. But we find it very helpful to think of EDM as just one example of a far more general concept: some supply chains are handled more efficiently within a single firm than through contract.
An extensive economic literature about vertical integration and “make or buy” decisions teaches us that vertical integration can spur innovation and greatly benefit consumers, especially when new methods require risky investments and coordination throughout the supply chain. Oliver Williamson won a Nobel Prize in 2009 for his work on these issues.

Read the full article on TAP: “How Will the FTC Evaluate Vertical Mergers?,” by Carl Shapiro and Herbert Hovenkamp.

Further Reading:

“Vertical Mergers and Input Foreclosure: Lessons from the AT&T/Time Warner Case,” by Carl Shapiro (Springer Nature, July 2021)

  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Facebook
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Twitter
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via Email
  • Share Carl Shapiro Critiques the FTC’s Withdrawal of 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines via LinkedIn

Carl Shapiro

About Carl Shapiro

Carl Shapiro is the Transamerica Professor of Business Strategy at the Haas School of Business, and Professor of Economics in the Economics Department, at the University of California at Berkeley. His current research interests include antitrust economics, intellectual property and licensing, patent policy, product standards and compatibility, and the economics of networks and interconnection.

Read full Bio

See more with Carl Shapiro

  • See more blog posts
  • See academic article summaries

Related Blog Posts

BLOG POST

The Quantified Worker: Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa’s Research on Workplace Surveillance and Automated Hiring Systems

Publication Date: June 29, 2023
Emory Law Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa discusses her new book, The Quantified Worker, Law and Technology in the Modern Workplace. She explains how the workforce science of today goes far beyond increasing efficiency and threatens to erase individual personhood.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
Featuring

 Ifeoma  Ajunwa

Ifeoma AjunwaTAP Scholar
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
  • Impact of Tech on Society
  • Future of Work
  • Tech’s Impact on Economic Equity
  • Tech’s Impact on Racial and Gender Equity
  • Artificial Intelligence Policy
BLOG POST

Recent Papers from TAP Scholars

Publication Date: January 15, 2021
A selection of articles recently written by TAP scholars explore AI and the impact on privacy, how to safeguard privacy and security in an interconnected world, digital platforms and antitrust, and patent reform to support innovation.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Privacy
  • Networks and Infrastructure
  • Internet
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Antitrust / Competition
  • Patents
  • Intellectual Property and Open Source
BLOG POST

The Most Read TAP Blogs from 2019

Publication Date: December 31, 2019
Take a look at the top viewed blog posts from this past year that have been written by TAP scholars.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Internet
  • Privacy
  • Cloud Computing
  • Media and Content
  • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Networks and Infrastructure
See All Blog Posts
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
Follow us on TwitterLink us on LinkedinLike us on FacebookWatch us on youtube
  • Blog Posts
  • Academic Article Summaries
  • Fact Sheets
  • Hot Topic

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Name
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Terms of Use
  • Feedback
© Copyright 2023