Skip to main content
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
  • Topics
    • Topics

    • Topics OverviewOverview
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning OverviewOverview
      • Artificial Intelligence Policy
      • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
      • Generative AI
    • Cybersecurity
      • Cybersecurity

      • Cybersecurity OverviewOverview
      • Cyber Peace / Cyber Warfare
      • Election Security
    • Impact of Tech on Society
      • Impact of Tech on Society

      • Impact of Tech on Society OverviewOverview
      • Future of Work
      • Tech’s Impact on Economic Equity
      • Tech’s Impact on Racial and Gender Equity
    • Innovation and Economic Impact
    • Intellectual Property and Open Source
      • Intellectual Property and Open Source

      • Intellectual Property and Open Source OverviewOverview
      • Copyright and Trademarks
      • Open Source
      • Patents
    • Networks and Infrastructure
      • Networks and Infrastructure

      • Networks and Infrastructure OverviewOverview
      • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
      • Cloud Computing
      • Internet
      • Net Neutrality
    • Platforms and Platform Regulation
      • Platforms and Platform Regulation

      • Platforms and Platform Regulation OverviewOverview
      • Antitrust / Competition
      • Content Moderation/Section 230
      • Disinformation / Misinformation
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Media and Content
    • Privacy
      • Privacy

      • Privacy OverviewOverview
      • Cross-Border Data Transfers
  • Scholars
  • Events
  • For the Media
    • For the Media

    • Media OverviewMedia Overview
    • Fact Sheets
    • Press Releases
  • About TAP
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter

Breadcrumbs

Go up a level to Home is the parent page of

  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Facebook
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Twitter
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Email
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via LinkedIn
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Pinterest
BLOG POST

Facial Recognition: Classification

Publication Date: June 16, 2022 5 minute read
Written By

Théodore Christakis

Theodore ChristakisTAP Scholar
CC
Claude Castelluccia

 Karine Bannelier

Karine Bannelier
DLM
Daniel Le Métayer
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Innovation and Economic Impact

As noted by the French Data Protection Authority (DPA), “Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés” (CNIL) in November 2019, “the current debate on facial recognition is sometimes distorted by a poor grasp of this technology and how it exactly works”. The objective of the present paper is, precisely, to present, in the most accessible way possible, exactly how facial recognition and facial analysis work.
- from “Facial Recognition: Classification.” Theodore Christakis, Professor of International and European Law at Université Grenoble Alpes, is the project leader.

Facial recognition technologies (FRT) perform functions such as authentication, identification, surveillance, and emotion recognition. They involve processing very sensitive biometric data. Unfortunately, debates over how to regulate the use of FRT lack clarity, consistent definitions, and a comprehensive understanding of how the distinct functionalities work.

The MAPping the Use of Facial Recognition in Public Spaces in Europe (MAPFRE) project is an independent study with the objective of analyzing the different functionalities and uses of facial recognition, exploring the related legal issues (i.e., data protection, algorithmic bias, use of facial analysis within the context of criminal investigations), and presenting 25 use cases.

In “Facial Recognition: Classification,” the second of six reports from the MAPFRE project, Theodore Christakis (project leader) and his coauthors Karine Bannelier, Claude Castelluccia, and Daniel Le Métayer provide a path to understanding how the different facial recognition and facial analysis technologies work. This report includes a “Classification Table” which details how the different facial processing functionalities and applications are used in public spaces. Below is the Executive Summary from this first report.

Executive Summary from “Classification.”
This is the second report from the Mapping the Use of Facial Recognition in Public Spaces in Europe (MAPFRE) project. It is written by Theodore Christakis (project leader), Karine Bannelier, Claude Castelluccia, and Daniel Le Métayer. Additional contributors are: Alexandre Lodie, Stephanie Celis Juarez, Coralie Pison-Hindawi, and Anaïs Trotry.

In Part 1 of our “MAPping the use of Facial Recognition in public spaces in Europe” (MAPFRE) project we explained in detail what “facial recognition” means, addressed the issues surrounding definitions, presented the political landscape and set out the exact material and geographical scope of the study. Furthermore, we explained how our study covers all the ways in which face processing systems are used in public spaces in Europe, whether the data involved are “biometric data” or, to use the new term, are “biometrics-based data”. Drawing on the draft EU AI Regulation, we also precisely defined what we mean by the term “public spaces” and presented three subcategories, that we have used for our study: “open spaces”; “restricted spaces”; “closed spaces”.
As noted by the French Data Protection Authority, CNIL [Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés], “the current debate on facial recognition is sometimes distorted by a poor grasp of this technology and how it exactly works”. The specific objective of the present paper is to present how facial recognition and facial analysis work.
We have also endeavoured to produce a “Classification Table” detailing how facial recognition/ analysis is used in public spaces. This classification table tries to present in the most accurate and accessible way the different facial processing functionalities and applications used in public spaces, which encompass the various forms of both “face recognition” and “face analysis”.
We hope that this classification table, together with the illustrations, explanations and numerous examples that are included, which are based on our “25 selected case studies”, will serve as a useful tool in preventing the various uses of facial recognition being conflated, and will bring further nuance and clarity to the public debate.

Classification Table
Classifying the uses of facial recognition/analysis in public space

Table: Classifying the uses of facial recognition/analysis in public spaces

Read the full report, Part 2 of Mapping the Use of Facial Recognition in Public Spaces in Europe (MAPFRE): “Classification” from the AI-Regulation.com website.

Read More:

Part 1 of the MAPFRE project, “A Quest for Clarity: Unpicking the 'Catch-All' Term” presents the current political landscape, dives into an analysis of the problems of definitions for key facial recognition terms, and explains the project’s main objectives and methodological tools.

Part 3 of the MAPFRE project, “Facial Recognition for Authorisation Purposes” is the first ever detailed analysis of what is the most widespread way in which Facial Recognition is used in public (& private) spaces: to authorise access to a place or to a service.

Parts 4 through 6 will be published in the near future. Look for them on the article page of the AI-Regulation.com website.

This Executive Summary of the second report from the Mapping the Use of Facial Recognition in Public Spaces in Europe project, titled, “Classification” was first published on the AI-Regulation.com website on May 17, 2022. It is reproduced here with the kind permission of the project leader, Professor Théodore Christakis.

Disclosure: Microsoft is a corporate sponsor of AI-Regulation.com, the website of the Chair on the Legal and Regulatory Implications of Artificial Intelligence at MIAI Grenoble Alpes, and Microsoft also sponsors the Technology | Academics | Policy (TAP) website. Microsoft respects academic freedom, and is working to enable the dialogue on the most critical tech policy issues being debated.

  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Facebook
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Twitter
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via Email
  • Share Facial Recognition: Classification via LinkedIn

Related Blog Posts

BLOG POST

Recent Papers from TAP Scholars

Publication Date: January 15, 2021
A selection of articles recently written by TAP scholars explore AI and the impact on privacy, how to safeguard privacy and security in an interconnected world, digital platforms and antitrust, and patent reform to support innovation.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Privacy
  • Networks and Infrastructure
  • Internet
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Antitrust / Competition
  • Patents
  • Intellectual Property and Open Source
BLOG POST

The Most Read TAP Blogs from 2019

Publication Date: December 31, 2019
Take a look at the top viewed blog posts from this past year that have been written by TAP scholars.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Internet
  • Privacy
  • Cloud Computing
  • Media and Content
  • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Networks and Infrastructure
BLOG POST

The Most Read TAP Blogs from 2020

Publication Date: December 31, 2020
Take a look at the top viewed blog posts from this past year that have been written by TAP scholars.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Privacy
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Networks and Infrastructure
  • Internet
  • Media and Content
  • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
See All Blog Posts
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
Follow us on TwitterLink us on LinkedinLike us on FacebookWatch us on youtube
  • Blog Posts
  • Academic Article Summaries
  • Fact Sheets
  • Hot Topic

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Name
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Terms of Use
  • Feedback
© Copyright 2023