Skip to main content
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
  • Topics
    • Topics

    • Topics OverviewOverview
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

      • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning OverviewOverview
      • Artificial Intelligence Policy
      • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
      • Generative AI
    • Cybersecurity
      • Cybersecurity

      • Cybersecurity OverviewOverview
      • Cyber Peace / Cyber Warfare
      • Election Security
    • Impact of Tech on Society
      • Impact of Tech on Society

      • Impact of Tech on Society OverviewOverview
      • Future of Work
      • Tech’s Impact on Economic Equity
      • Tech’s Impact on Racial and Gender Equity
    • Innovation and Economic Impact
    • Intellectual Property and Open Source
      • Intellectual Property and Open Source

      • Intellectual Property and Open Source OverviewOverview
      • Copyright and Trademarks
      • Open Source
      • Patents
    • Networks and Infrastructure
      • Networks and Infrastructure

      • Networks and Infrastructure OverviewOverview
      • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
      • Cloud Computing
      • Internet
      • Net Neutrality
    • Platforms and Platform Regulation
      • Platforms and Platform Regulation

      • Platforms and Platform Regulation OverviewOverview
      • Antitrust / Competition
      • Content Moderation/Section 230
      • Disinformation / Misinformation
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Media and Content
    • Privacy
      • Privacy

      • Privacy OverviewOverview
      • Cross-Border Data Transfers
  • Scholars
  • Events
  • For the Media
    • For the Media

    • Media OverviewMedia Overview
    • Fact Sheets
    • Press Releases
  • About TAP
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter

Breadcrumbs

Go up a level to Home is the parent page of

  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Facebook
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Twitter
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Email
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via LinkedIn
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Pinterest
BLOG POST

The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston

Publication Date: January 18, 2018 5 minute read
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
Featuring

Gregory L. Rosston

Gregory L. RosstonTAP Scholar
  • Net Neutrality
  • Networks and Infrastructure
The recent rule changes will not kill the internet. Nor would not changing them (or getting struck down by a court challenge) kill the internet. We have had 20 years of broadband service. Access providers have invested a lot to increase speeds substantially under a variety of regulations. Edge providers have also invested dramatically over the past 20 years. Both sides are likely to continue to invest.
In short, the FCC’s regulatory classification of ISPs is probably not nearly as big a deal as people think it is.
(“Net Neutrality: Changing Regulations Won’t Kill the Internet,” SIEPR Policy Brief by Gregory Rosston, January 2018)

Last month, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal the net neutrality rules it adopted in 2015 by approving FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s Proposal to Restore Internet Freedom. This decision changed the regulatory framework governing internet service providers from a common carrier service classification (under Title II of the Communications Act) to an information service (regulated under Title I).

Net neutrality advocates state that Chairman Pai’s rescinding of Title II protections for broadband will harm innovation, consumers, and the economy. See “FCC’s Rushed, Technically Flawed Decision Will Harm the Economy” by Stanford professor Barbara van Schewick and “How the FCC's Net Neutrality Plan Breaks With 50 Years of History” by Columbia law professor Tim Wu.

Current congressional and legal actions to counter the FCC’s latest net neutrality vote are summed up in this C|net article: “Net neutrality allies are ready to fight. But can it be saved?”

Stanford’s Gregory Rosston provides his insights to the net neutrality debate in a policy brief he recently prepared for the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR): Net Neutrality: Changing Regulations Won’t Kill the Internet. Professor Rosston served as Deputy Chief Economist of the Federal Communications Commission, working on the implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Additionally, he has written extensively on the application of economics to telecommunications issues, as well as numerous articles on competition in local telecommunications and implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Professor Rosston is the Gordon Cain Senior Fellow at the SIEPR and Director of the Public Policy program at Stanford University; he is also a Professor of Economics by courtesy.

Below are a few excerpts from Net Neutrality: Changing Regulations Won’t Kill the Internet.

The phrase “net neutrality” sounds like something everyone should support and makes a great bumper sticker. But to fully understand the implications of net neutrality requires understanding what the bumper sticker means.
Access to Local ISPs
Understanding how content providers can connect to their customers through local ISPs is important for both legal and economic analysis of restrictions.
Content providers can send their content to local ISPs through content distribution networks (“CDNs”). These third-party companies negotiate deals with the local ISPs so that their customers don’t have to. Each local ISP negotiates deals with many different third-party CDNs so content companies have choices for CDN service.
In 2013, when Netflix traffic slowed on several ISPs, the debate was not about blocking but about who should pay to increase the capacity of traffic into the ISPs from the third-party CDNs Netflix was using. Ultimately, Netflix decided to enter into direct access connections with some of the ISPs.
Legal Issues
Congress provides several mechanisms for FCC regulation through the 1934 and the 1996 Telecommunications Acts. The two most important in the current context are in Title II that applies to “common carriers” and Title I that applies to “information service” providers — hence, “Title II” and “Title I” regulation. One key issue in the dispute is whether ISPs are common carriers subject to Title II regulation or information service providers subject to Title I regulation. The FCC, with oversight from the courts, makes this call.
While regulation differs from antitrust in many ways, antitrust provides a useful analogy. Antitrust law distinguishes between practices that are per se illegal (price fixing most prominently) because there are limited or no social welfare benefits and most other actions that have some efficiency justifications and therefore undergo a rule of reason analysis to assess welfare trade-offs. Title II regulation is more similar to a per se bar on actions whereas Title I regulation tends to be more akin to the rule of reason approach.

Read the full policy brief on Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR): Net Neutrality: Changing Regulations Won’t Kill the Internet.

In the below video, Professor Rosston discusses the implications of the FCC’s recent decision and explains some of the arguments for and against net neutrality.

Read more of Professor Rosston’s work on the network neutrality:

  • “An Antitrust Analysis of the Case for Wireless Net Neutrality” with Michael Topper (Information, Economics and Policy, Vol. 22 No. 1, March 2010 pp 103-119)
    • Also available, the TAP article summary.
  • “Local Broadband Access: Primum Non Nocere or Primum Processi? A Property Rights Approach” with Bruce M. Owen in Net Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services be Regulated (Thomas M. Lenard and Randolph J. May, editors, Springer: New York, 2006)
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Facebook
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Twitter
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via Email
  • Share The Recent FCC Ruling Will Not Kill the Internet – A Policy Brief by SIEPR’s Gregory Rosston via LinkedIn

Gregory L. Rosston

About Gregory L. Rosston

Gregory L. Rosston is Deputy Director and Senior Fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) and Director of the Public Policy Program at Stanford University. He is also a Professor of Economics by courtesy and teaches courses on competition policy and strategy, intellectual property, personal finance, and writing and rhetoric. His research has focused on industrial organization, antitrust and regulation.

Read full Bio

See more with Gregory L. Rosston

  • See more blog posts
  • See academic article summaries

Related Blog Posts

BLOG POST

The Quantified Worker: Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa’s Research on Workplace Surveillance and Automated Hiring Systems

Publication Date: June 29, 2023
Emory Law Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa discusses her new book, The Quantified Worker, Law and Technology in the Modern Workplace. She explains how the workforce science of today goes far beyond increasing efficiency and threatens to erase individual personhood.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
Featuring

 Ifeoma  Ajunwa

Ifeoma AjunwaTAP Scholar
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
  • Impact of Tech on Society
  • Future of Work
  • Tech’s Impact on Economic Equity
  • Tech’s Impact on Racial and Gender Equity
  • Artificial Intelligence Policy
BLOG POST

Recent Papers from TAP Scholars

Publication Date: January 15, 2021
A selection of articles recently written by TAP scholars explore AI and the impact on privacy, how to safeguard privacy and security in an interconnected world, digital platforms and antitrust, and patent reform to support innovation.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Privacy
  • Networks and Infrastructure
  • Internet
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Antitrust / Competition
  • Patents
  • Intellectual Property and Open Source
BLOG POST

The Most Read TAP Blogs from 2019

Publication Date: December 31, 2019
Take a look at the top viewed blog posts from this past year that have been written by TAP scholars.
Written By
TAP Staff Blogger
  • Internet
  • Privacy
  • Cloud Computing
  • Media and Content
  • Broadband and Wireless Technologies
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Networks and Infrastructure
See All Blog Posts
Technology | Academics | Policy - Home
Follow us on TwitterLink us on LinkedinLike us on FacebookWatch us on youtube
  • Blog Posts
  • Academic Article Summaries
  • Fact Sheets
  • Hot Topic

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Name
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Terms of Use
  • Feedback
© Copyright 2023